BankopediaBankopedia
PPB Unit CChapter Notes8–10 Marks Expected

Important Laws Relating to Recovery of Dues

Principles & Practices of Banking | Unit C · Chapter 29

Chapter 28 (NPAs) showed when a loan fails to perform. This chapter covers what the law allows the bank to do about it — five statutes that together form the legal arsenal for debt recovery: the DRB Act 1993 (tribunals), SARFAESI 2002 (enforcement without court), IBC 2016 (insolvency resolution), the Legal Services Authorities Act 1987 (Lok Adalats), and the Limitation Act (time limits for legal action).

By Bankopedia.co.inUpdated 2026JAIIB PPB · Module C

📌 Why This Chapter Matters in JAIIB

Expect 8–10 questions spread across five statutes — this is one of the widest-coverage chapters in PPB Unit C. The examiner tests three clusters hard: (1) Numbers — ₹20L DRT threshold, 60-day SARFAESI notice, 50%/25% DRAT deposit, 180/330-day CIRP window, ₹1cr IBC threshold, ₹20L Lok Adalat ceiling; (2) Constitutional validity cases — Mardia Chemicals and Delhi High Court Bar Association; (3) IBC timelines — CIRP 180+extension, Fast Track 90+45, PPIRP 120 days with 90-day RP submission, IBBI composition (3+1+5 members). Limitation periods (3/12/30 years) are near-certain numerical questions.

Key Numbers & Thresholds — Chapter 29 at a Glance

Rs 20 lakhDRB Act: minimum debt threshold for DRT jurisdiction
4 years / 70 yrsDRT Presiding Officer term / maximum age
30 daysDefendant's time to file written statement before DRT
180 daysDRT disposal target; also CIRP period under IBC
30 daysDRAT appeal filing period from receipt of DRT order
50% / min 25%DRAT: deposit required to file appeal / minimum after reduction
75% (struck down)Mardia Chemicals: original Sec 17(2) SARFAESI deposit declared unconstitutional
60 daysSARFAESI: notice to NPA borrower to discharge liabilities in full
Rs 1 lakh / 20%SARFAESI qualifying: security > Rs 1L AND dues ≥ 20% of principal+interest
60%SARFAESI: multi-creditor consent needed before enforcement
Rs 300 croreMinimum NOF for ARC registered on/after October 11, 2022
Rs 500 crore+NARCL: acquires legacy stressed assets with exposure at this level
45 daysSARFAESI: borrower's time to apply to DRT against enforcement
March 31, 2011CERSAI became operational
3 yearsSARFAESI limitation period for enforcement action
Rs 1 croreIBC: minimum default for CIRP of corporate debtors
October 1, 2016IBBI established under IBC
330 daysIBC: absolute maximum CIRP period including extensions
90 + 45 daysIBC Fast Track CIRP: standard + maximum extension
66%PPIRP: financial creditor approval threshold for MSME debtors
120 / 90 daysPPIRP: total period / deadline to submit plan to AA
14 daysIBC: bankruptcy order must be passed within this period
Rs 1,000IBC: minimum default for individuals / partnership firms
Rs 20 lakhLok Adalat: monetary ceiling for civil disputes
3 / 12 / 30 yrsLimitation: demand loans / mortgage enforcement / foreclosure
Section 1

Recovery of Debts & Bankruptcy Act, 1993 — Tribunals & Setup

Why the DRB Act Was Needed

Before 1993, banks had no dedicated forum — they had to queue behind ordinary civil litigants in district courts. Backlogs stretched recovery timelines to decades. Huge assets sat blocked as unproductive, draining bank productivity. Parliament enacted the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (now called the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act — DRB Act) to create a fast-track, dedicated tribunal system.

29.2.1

Constitutional Validity — The Landmark Case

The Delhi High Court Bar Association challenged the DRB Act before the Delhi High Court, which declared it unconstitutional. On appeal, the Supreme Court in Union of India vs Delhi High Court Bar Association (2002) 4 SCC 275 reversed that finding and upheld the Act's constitutional validity. The Act remains fully operative.

DRT & DRAT — Key Structural Facts

DRT CompositionOne person only — the Presiding Officer (PO). Not a bench. Staff includes one or more Recovery Officers.
PO QualificationMust be, or have been, or be qualified to be appointed as a District Judge.
PO Term4 years from date of assumption, OR until age 70 — whichever is earlier.
DRAT CompositionOne person — the Chairperson (who must be, or qualify as, a High Court Judge).
DRAT PowersChairperson supervises all DRTs within jurisdiction; can transfer cases, review performance, convene meetings.
Minimum DebtRs 20 lakh — cases below this are outside DRT jurisdiction.
Bar on Civil CourtsOnce a DRT is established in an area, civil courts lose jurisdiction over qualifying recovery cases (not HC/SC).

🧠 Mnemonic — DRB Act Key Numbers

20L = threshold
4yr/70 = PO tenure
30d = written stmt
180d = DRT disposal
30d = DRAT appeal
50/25% = DRAT deposit

"Twenty Lakhs, Four Years, Thirty Days, Half and Quarter" — the DRT number ladder.

Section 2

DRB Act Procedure — Application to Recovery

Step-by-Step: Filing to Recovery Certificate

1. File applicationBank/FI files application (Sec 19) with DRT of competent jurisdiction (where defendant resides / works, or where branch account is maintained, or cause of action arises).
2. DRT issues summonsDefendant must show cause within 30 days why relief should not be granted. DRT may also direct defendant to disclose assets and restrain disposal.
3. Written statementDefendant must file written defence (including set-off claims) within 30 days of receiving summons. Counter-claims are also possible.
4. Interim ordersDRT may attach property, appoint receiver, pass interim injunctions during proceedings.
5. Final order & Recovery CertificatePO passes order; issues Recovery Certificate to Recovery Officer (RO) for execution. Certificate is deemed a court decree.
6. Disposal targetDRT must attempt final disposal within 180 days from receipt of application.
7. Recovery by RORO can attach/sell property, arrest defendant, appoint receiver — same powers as Third Schedule of Income Tax Act 1961.
8. DRAT appealAppeal filed within 30 days of receiving DRT order, with 50% deposit (reducible to 25% by DRAT). DRAT must attempt disposal within 6 months.

Doctrine of Election — DRT vs SARFAESI

Can a bank simultaneously pursue DRT proceedings AND SARFAESI enforcement? The Doctrine of Election says "if you choose one remedy, you cannot use another inconsistent remedy." It applies only when all three elements coexist:

Element 1

Two or more remedies exist

Element 2

The remedies are inconsistent with each other

Element 3

A choice of one has been made

⚠️ Supreme Court Ruling

DRT and SARFAESI are not inconsistent — they are complementary remedies. Therefore the Doctrine of Election does not apply. A bank may simultaneously pursue both or switch between them. Withdrawal of DRT application is NOT a pre-condition for taking SARFAESI action.

Overriding Effect & Priority

  • DRB Act has overriding effect over the Companies Act — leave of the company court is NOT needed to file a DRT case even if winding-up proceedings are pending (Allahabad Bank vs Canara Bank AIR 2000 SC 1535).
  • Recovery Officer has powers equivalent to a Tax Recovery Officer under Income Tax Act 1961 (Third Schedule).
  • Secured creditors have priority over all other debts including government dues — subject to IBC provisions.
  • Recovery certificate is deemed a court decree and can initiate winding-up proceedings against a company.

Free — no credit card needed

Register free to read the full guide

All 25 chapters covered, plus a downloadable PDF study pack.

  • Full guide — all 24 IIBF syllabus chapters
  • PDF study pack — download and read offline
  • Name screening, alert categories, STR writing guide
  • 2025–26 regulatory updates included